The race to find a better alternative energy source is on. This is because the efficiency of fossil fuels is amazing. Carbon dioxide emissions from fossil power plants are the number one killer of the environment. In many ways, he is slowly dragging the planet to its unfortunate end. That is why many researchers are continually learning new sources, new methods of providing people with energy that is as efficient and effective as our current method but produces fewer or zero emissions. So far, these alternative sources are solar energy, tidal energy, wind energy and others.
The problem is that, from all these sources, it could power a vehicle and other machinery that runs on fuel. Solar energy is slowly gaining attention, but it is still not enough to run machinery and vehicles. The solution is to find a fuel source that can be burned. Something that engines could swallow and vaporize to power the millions of vehicles that run on traditional fuel-based engines. Bioethanol is one of the solutions that technology devised. It is a new generation of fuel that can be used in vehicles and any other equipment in the same way that they would use fuel. Now, they have already branded it as something that is revolutionary since it comes from natural sources, but there have been disputes and debates that are currently ongoing among environmentalists as to whether bioethanol is really a benefit or another curse for the planet. To solve this problem, we have to weigh both sides. We should learn the different pros and cons of this alternative fuel so that we can know if it is any good at all.
Bioethanol fuel does not produce deadly carbon emissions; it could actually reduce emissions by as much as ninety percent. It’s also produced from natural sources, crops like corn and other things, crops that are usually used for animal feed. Therefore, it is less likely to be a contaminant. In fact, it is clean and green.
However, many crops are needed to produce a sufficient amount of biofuel. That’s why it would definitely create an imbalance. Crops that are supposed to be used for food would be used to produce fuel. This would lead to higher animal feed prices and would ripple down and create higher feed prices as well. Eventually, it would cause people to starve. In addition, due to the high demand for crops to produce this type of fuel, large areas of land are needed to convert them into farmland. This would lead to the disruption of the animals’ natural habitat, as well as less land for humans and animals alike. It would create such an imbalance that it would eventually lead to starvation. Another issue is that it is not recommended to use bioethanol in vehicles in large quantities; therefore, you still need to mix it with fossil fuel.